Infidelity: A fling doesn′t have to finish all the pieces | Science| In-depth reporting on science and expertise | DW

Whenever Stephan used to travel, Maria couldn’t sleep. The fear that her boyfriend might end up in some other woman’s bed kept her awake at night.

Finally it happened: Stephan cheated, confessed, and Maria’s world collapsed.

For many couples, the story ends there. Such a betrayal often feels too big, too destructive. The relationship is over.

Maria and Stephan, on the other hand, are still together.

Not only that: Twelve years later, they have two children. And Maria says the whole episode even strengthened their trust in their own relationship.


We’re all cheaters

Kristin Gilbert, a psychologist and psychotherapist, has a professional interest in the factors that motivate people to have a fling with someone else. More than ten years ago, she, together with colleagues at the Technical University Braunschweig, looked into exactly which circumstances contribute to cheating. Using the data collected in the study, the scientists developed a therapy specifically for couples whose relationship has been upset by infidelity.

Gilbert’s conclusion: “We are all potential cheaters. At least when certain risk factors come together.”

People like Stephan, who likes to travel, knows many people and loves parties, have many more opportunities to have sex as opposed to those who rarely leave their own little microcosm.

Gilbert calls this “contextual risk factors.”

Opportunities alone, of course, do not automatically trigger infidelity, though.

“Often, the partnership, and especially the sexual satisfaction, was low,” Gilbert says of the people surveyed at that time.

As satisfaction decreases over the duration of the relationship, the willingness to cheat increases. Here, the psychologist speaks of “partnership risk factors.”

Children, she says, usually increase this risk. Stephan cheated with Maria just a few months after the birth of her first child. “He was at the bottom of my list of priorities,” she explains of the situation at that time.

Still, Maria seems to have completely overcome an experience that might have traumatized other women for the rest of their lives.

The question is: How?

Read more: How fashion impacts our mental wellbeing

Freedom through cheating

With the help of the therapists, Maria and Stephan looked at patterns that had a decisive influence on their behavior as a couple.

This is what Kristin Gilbert summarizes under “individual risk factors.”

“An important point is the concept of loyalty,” she says. “The more liberal my attitude toward monogamy and loyalty is, the higher the probability that I will be unfaithful.”

Another important motive for the cheaters interviewed by the scientists was their desire for freedom and autonomy.

This also applies to Stephan: During therapy, he realized that as soon as he saw his freedom in danger, he destroyed things — repeatedly — that were important to him.

In the end, he not only harmed others, but himself.

Perpetrator and victim – who’s who?

Of course, the one who deceives is the perpetrator, and the one who is being deceived is the victim. That, at least, is the overriding consensus in society.

Maria also felt this way. And she wasn’t wrong. But it’s not the whole truth, either.

Psychologist and couples therapist Hans-Georg Lauer says “infidelity does not mean the end of a relationship.”

To understand why, he says, “two levels” have to be distinguished.

First: The person who cheats becomes, of course, the perpetrator. That much is clear. Nor should anyone who engages in such behavior be surprised at the anger and pain they cause in their deceived partner.

That said, both partners, Lauer explains, are involved in relationship dynamics that form the breeding ground upon which infidelity grows.

Infografik Do you believe people are monogamous by nature? EN

The couple therapist outlines three steps to ensure that the relationship still has a chance after the betrayal — and which can help to prevent anger and pain from becoming lifelong companions.

Read more: Instant gratification and the pursuit of perfection: Why our brains love Instagram

First of all, it is essential to re-establish a minimum of trust.

“This requires openness,” Lauer says.

In his therapy sessions, the cheated are therefore allowed to ask questions. “This strengthens mutual understanding,” he explains. And in addition, it helps the couples to able to speak again — a not unimportant prerequisite for a potential restart of the relationship.

With those questions, though, come fresh wounds. 

“To make the deception concrete, and to give a name to the unknown, also makes the pain really noticeable,” he says. “Step one: Enduring questions. Step two: Enduring pain.”

Third, it’s important to be aware that there are no quick-fix answers.

“Some couples tend to go straight back into their daily agenda,” he says. To them, it seems easier to quickly accept what has happened than to become fully aware of the consequences of the problem and to endure the uncertainty.

“But,” he says, “that usually backfires.”

Read more: Why can’t we tickle ourselves?

A pensioner-couple sitting on a bench on a levee

Surviving a crisis can mean a quantum leap for a couple

Maria can confirm that it is, indeed, worthwhile to take a look at the personal patterns of the two partners. After all, where there’s personal responsibility, there’s also room to maneuver. “It made me feel totally relieved to realize that I’m not just a victim,” she says.

Back when she, herself, was single, she often found herself in the role of the “other woman” in the lives of the men she fell for — the “secret lover” in a three-way constellation.

What doesn’t kill you makes you strong

In therapies, the — often unconscious — ideologies that determine the path our lives take are often revealed. Maria believed, for example, that she “wasn’t worth someone committing to entirely.” 

When Stephen cheated on her, she saw her worthlessness confirmed.

But Stephen stayed. Although he was strongly drawn to the other woman, he decided to break through his own patterns of behavior and continue the relationship with Maria. “To experience that we managed to get through this crisis, that relaxed me a lot,” Maria says.

Lauer adds that “a couple who are going through a crisis together can make a quantum leap.” This applies as well, he says, to Maria and Stephen. For them, the issue of further “escapades” is no longer a specter that haunts them. And it isn’t just because Maria has forgiven her husband, or that both of them are more aware of their patterns of action than before the deception.

Maria also defeated her feeling of worthlessness.

She survived, and she says that now, her relationship had become stronger and more honest. “I always thought that if he cheated, I couldn’t bear it. That it would kill me.”

Today, when Maria speaks of one of the most difficult times of her life, she sounds grateful that it all happened the way it did. 

Read more: Opinion: Optimists are stupid. Serves them right.

  • Picture book depiction of Little Red Riding Hood and wolf (Bilderbuchmuseum Burg Wissem/DW/L. Albrecht)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    German Romanticism

    The Brothers Grimm describe Little Red Riding Hood as a young girl, innocent and blond – but that wasn’t always the case. The girl is much older in other versions of the tale, and there wasn’t always a happy ending either. That was a German twist to the story. Little Red Riding Hood first started in France.

  • Gustave Doré's Little Red Riding Hood as an illustration (Gemeinfrei)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    The seductive French wolf

    “Viens te coucher avec moi” – Come to bed with me. That’s how the wolf tries to entice Little Red Riding Hood into his bed. Accepting his invitation, she undresses – clearly an allusion to sex. In 1697, Charles Perrault wrote his story of the “Petit Chaperon Rouge;” the copper engraving was done by Gustave Doré. In those days, the story was told as a warning against male seducers.

  • Early English version of the Little Red Riding Hood fairytale (Bilderbuchmuseum Burg Wissem/DW/L. Albrecht)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    First English version

    The tale of the coquettish French Little Red Riding Hood was adapted into English in 1729 – without a happy ending. Little Red Riding Hood and her grandmother are devoured by the wolf, and that was that. No hunter came to their rescue. Typical for the English version is that the girl wasn’t only wearing a red hood, but also a red riding coat.

  • Illustration of Little Red Riding Hood (Bilderbuchmuseum der Burg Wissem in Troisdorf)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    Little Red Riding Hood with a happy ending

    The first German version of the Little Red Riding Hood was not the work of the Brothers Grimm, but of writer Ludwig Tieck. The romanticist who disliked the gloomy ending of the French version added a hunter who rescued the girl to the original tale. And in 1812, the Brothers Grimm turned the flirtatious Little Red Riding Hood into an innocent little girl, avoiding any sexual connotations.

  • Playing cards featuring Little Red Riding Hood images (Bilderbuchmuseum Burg Wissem/DW/L. Albrecht)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    Little Red Riding Hood gets famous

    Very quickly, the tale of Little Red Riding Hood became a hit in Germany and the rest of Europe. Elements from the story were printed on post cards and imitated in parlor games. Even today, the sweet little girl with the red hood embellishes champagne bottles, cheese packages and chocolates.

  • Illustration by Geoffroy de Pennart (Bilderbuchmuseum der Burg Wissem in Troisdorf)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    A modern, headstrong girl

    Little Red Riding Hood continues to be en vogue while being constantly reinterpreted. In his children’s book “Rothütchen” (Little Red Hat), Geoffroy de Pennart turned her into a recalcitrant girl that even attacks the wolf, reflecting a modern idea of obedient, but self-conscious children.

  • Excerpt from Little Red Riding Hood books by Laurence Batigne and Bruno de la Salle (Bilderbuchmuseum Burg Wissem/DW/L. Albrecht)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    A less violent take

    The 1980s were dominated by yet another educational theory. Back then, the objective was nonviolent education. That’s why, in a more contemporary version, the wolf didn’t devour Litte Red Riding Hood, but restrained himself to controlling her movements with a loop around her foot. That’s illustrated here in the book “Le Petit Chaperon Rouge” by Laurence Batigne and Bruno de la Salle.

  • Sexualized illustration of Little Red Riding Hood by Bettina Bayerl (Bilderbuchmuseum Burg Wissem/DW/L. Albrecht)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    The wolf as a sex object

    The 1990s saw yet another reinterpretation of the tale. This bold 1993 fantasy by Bettina Bayerl called “Keine Gnade!” (No Mercy!) brought back the obscenity and sexuality that was only hinted at in the original French version.

  • Illustration of Little Red Riding Hood by Burdi Kühnemann (Bilderbuchmuseum Burg Wissem/DW/L. Albrecht)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    Little Red Riding Hood becomes the villain

    In this version, Burgi Kühnemann portrays Little Red Riding Hood as the real villain who overruns the poor wolf, which is threatened with extinction. Kühnemann is a book artist who works fairy tales. In another version, she draws parallels between Little Red Riding Hood and Hitler, who she claims loved calling himself “Uncle Wolf” and enjoyed being adored for his manliness.

  • Warja Honegger-Lavater's artwork Le petit Chaperon Rouge, Paris 1965 and New York 1971 (Bilderbuchmuseum der Burg Wissem in Troisdorf)

    Why Little Red Riding Hood is caught between innocence and sexuality

    Little Red Riding Hood – a bit abstract for a change

    There’s also a version of the Little Red Riding Hood that does without any moral assessments. In the 1960s, artist Warja Honegger-Lavater depicted the tale only with dots. The resulting radical abstraction permitted all kinds of possible and impossible fantasies on the theme, releasing is from various cultures, eras or age groups.

Comments are closed.