In a landmark and momentous legal decision, the Kerala High Court recently upheld the fundamental rights of a mother in matters of child custody, particularly in cases involving international relocation for career advancement. This ruling came in response to an application from a mother who had sought permission to accompany her child to New Zealand, where she had secured work and residency status. The family court initially rejected her request, triggering a legal battle that ultimately ended in a decisive judgment by a bench comprising Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque and Justice Sophy Thomas.
This judgment not only recognized the mother’s legitimate aspirations, but also highlighted the paramount importance of the child’s well-being and the fundamental rights of both biological parents in the child’s upbringing. Let’s dive into the details of this significant legal development.
The mother’s right to custody and relocation is recognized
• In a landmark decision, the Kerala High Court upheld a mother’s right to retain custody of her child even if she moves abroad to improve her career prospects.
• The mother’s application to accompany her child to New Zealand, where she had secured a job and residency status, was initially rejected by a family court.
• The Supreme Court Chamber ruled in favor of the mother, recognizing that the pursuit of better career prospects was the primary reason for her move and should not be used as a reason to deny her custody of the child.
The welfare and rights of the child are emphasized
• The Kerala High Court emphasized that the welfare of the child should be paramount in custody disputes.
• The court found that she should not be denied custody if the mother’s relocation would have a better chance and the child’s best interests would be protected.
• The importance of a child recognizing his or her biological parents and having the right to grow up under their care and protection was highlighted.
• The Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with the family court’s assessment of the child’s welfare and emphasized the child’s fundamental right to be with both biological parents.
Procedure and care for the father
• The Supreme Court ruling upheld the mother’s appeal and appointed her as the sole guardian of the child’s move to New Zealand.
• It granted the father custody and visitation rights for a short period of time, ensuring that he could continue to participate in the child’s life.
• The mother was prohibited from changing the child’s nationality without the father’s consent, ensuring a balanced and protective approach to the child’s upbringing.
Comments are closed.