The controversial custody bill

King Solomon explained it in a famous story: The good parent since ancient times is the one who is able to sacrifice for the well -being of the children, and not for those who want to cut the children into half. Cutting the children in two halves is exactly what the law of Law S 832 has signed by 14 senators of the majority (Balboni, Leonardi, Spinelli, Farfoli, Barcaiuolo, Petrenga, Berrino, Rapani, Sigismondi, Rosa, Iannone, Menia and Tanzi -Di -Sant Stadium. Take it or leave it. Provides that in the event of suspected violence “. Forced to comply with the dictation of the double residence for children at any age; After two years, the allowance for the fragile ex-partner stop; to say goodbye to the family house with a stroke; For direct maintenance of the minor. But the placement in the maintenance of the minor is worse in “serious reasons”. What are these serious reasons? Not only serious failures that damage the minor, but also “that hinder the proper exercise of parental responsibility”. And at this point in time, the legal and scientific construct is created, which is viewed at the European level of “parental alienation” and its derivatives as “parental rejection”. PAS (parental alienation) thus returns under false preliminary walls. And not even a mention of the scourge of domestic violence in the text: the co-parents is blind and deaf, it must be guaranteed regardless of this. The case of Mamma Frida, who has been fighting in court and her daughter for 8 years, returns to parliament, Bolnini Nordio. According to the women's association, the draft law should be stopped immediately: “It is another attack on the rights of the children to live a calm childhood without trauma. A bit like the story of King Solomon, it is not a wisdom:” It is state violence. “According to the association, the law” returns to Article 6 with a perfect co-parents in Article 6: Lega Senator Simone Pillon, which has already been submitted with his draft law in 2018. “In the letter, the draft law is quoted in several points.” In the new wording – you write – 'The minor child has the right to preserve a balanced and continuous relationship with each of the parents and significant relationships with relatives in his exclusive moral and material interest. Disciplined, properly, properly, that the underage children remain entrusted to both parents and that placing in houses is the same “.” “” Two houses, two live, maybe even far apart. Can this be the superior interest of the minor? “, She asked. According to the association, the minor's interest would” disappear from the judge's evaluation faculties “and add:” The obligation to arrange completely the same custody is actually a device for a new attack on mothers.

© all rights reserved
This article is automatically translated

Comments are closed.