The idea of justice is crucial for any society as it aims to protect the rights, equality and fairness of every person. Legal changes have brought significant progress in improving marital relations, especially when it comes to the prohibition of dowry. However, as shown in the image below, the issue of dowry has been addressed through legal means. In contrast, the laws on maintenance require a more thoughtful and fair solution.
The development of dowry laws
Over the years, India has implemented various reforms to combat dowry. One important law, the Dowry Prohibition Act of 1961, was designed to discourage dowry in marriages. Although the incidence of dowry-related violence has declined somewhat over time, it still exists. The laws and social campaigns have together helped curb dowry cultural practices in the region and provide women with a framework for legal protection.
Dowry, a concrete manifestation of gender inequality, has been crucial in the development of laws to protect women in India. However, the focus on dowry leads to other aspects of marriage law, such as maintenance, being overlooked.
Maintenance: A new frontier for legal reform
To avoid the financial difficulties of a husband or wife whose entire livelihood depends on their spouse's income, spousal maintenance, also known as alimony, was introduced. Maintenance used to be paid to women because they were usually the homemakers and their husbands provided the income. However, family dynamics and gender roles have evolved and more women earn more money and are the primary breadwinners in some families. Therefore, the expectation has changed that women in marriages should not automatically be financially dependent.
However, maintenance law has not kept pace with societal changes in the roles of men and women. Men disproportionately pay maintenance, and in some cases where women are the primary earners rather than men but continue to demand maintenance, this is evidence that maintenance law needs to be updated. In addition, maintenance should not be enforced if the financial circumstances of the marriage do not require maintenance. Therefore, it is not only unfair but also unreasonable for one of the parties to be bound to maintenance payments in a divorce.
This is why there has been a demand for reform in maintenance law so that maintenance laws can be amended to ensure that both spouses are treated fairly and equally. The Supreme Court in Manish Jain vs. Akanksha Jain (2017) held that a wife who is capable of supporting herself is not entitled to maintenance. The court was of the view that maintenance is only meant to meet actual needs and not to cover the risk of deprivation.
For a balanced legal framework
The urgency of reforming maintenance law is not to remove protections for women, but a call to develop a model that treats each case on the basis of individual circumstances. Improvements could include:
The urgency of reforming maintenance law is not to remove protections for women, but a call to develop a model that treats each case on the basis of individual circumstances. Improvements could include:
- Gender-neutral maintenance laws: The law should recognise that after divorce, both men and women are no longer able to earn money. The maintenance awarded by the court must be based on the need of the spouse and the ability of the other spouse to pay and must not be based on stereotypical notions about gender roles in society. The Delhi High Court in Ravindra Nath Sharma vs. Saroj Sharma (2014) summed up that gender should not be the only basis for awarding spousal maintenance. In that case, the court emphasised that financial resources less liabilities of both parties (including the fact that the woman was employed) should be considered. It reduced the maintenance on the basis of the woman's financial independence.
- Time-limited maintenance: In situations where alimony is appropriate, it should not be permanent. Temporary alimony would help both parties become financially independent and would also be a temporary aid to those who need financial help.
- Contributions from both parties: It is argued that while determining maintenance, the court should consider the non-financial contributions of both spouses, such as childcare and housekeeping. This will help in recognising the value of the unpaid work that is usually done by the non-earning spouse. The Punjab and Haryana High Court in Uttam Kumar vs. Meena Kumari (2021) highlighted that while deciding maintenance, the husband's ability to pay is a very relevant consideration. It also pointed out that if the wife is not dependent on the husband or financially independent, she should probably receive less maintenance. This judgment supports maintenance laws that better consider the financial situation of both parties, which will help in ensuring fairness and preventing unfair burden on one spouse just because he or she has a well-paying career.
- Mediation and Collaborative Law: Promoting the use of mediation and collaborative legal processes in maintenance disputes is supported. These alternative methods of dispute resolution would help couples reach a fair agreement without going through the process and would also allow for a more flexible, individualised agreement based on the particular circumstances of each couple.
Conclusion: On the way to legal justice
The law needs to adapt to changing realities. But we also need to address the imbalances in maintenance rights that affect both genders, while fighting the practice of dowry. This requires comprehensive legal reform that ensures that everyone in society not only experiences justice, but can see that it is being upheld.
A more open and fair legal framework could help us achieve a society where equality is not just a word, but something we experience every day. This proposal for changes to maintenance law does not challenge the protections already in place, but serves as a tool to bring balance and fairness to the whole process.
Furthermore, this reform proposal does not reduce current protections, but proposes new changes that take into account different perspectives of modern life. It is important that both men and women have their rights protected by law, including fair management of maintenance payments.
It can be suggested that we discuss how we can create a more inclusive and fair legal structure that takes into account the needs of all and makes equality not just an ideal but a reality.
Comments are closed.